← Back to Programme Home · Common Law Constitution page

Common Law Constitution — Numbered Source Digest v5

Working library draft v5. Stable internal references retained for the foundation liberties, Christian constitutional inheritance, Union settlement, sovereignty, external authority, and anti-arbitrary-power sources.

Drafting note: These are controlled working references, not official statutory section numbers.
CodeFoundation document
PRPetition of Right
HCHabeas Corpus Act
BRBill of Rights
ASAct of Settlement
MCMagna Carta 1297
COCoronation Oath Act 1688
CRClaim of Right Act 1689 (Scotland)
USActs of Union with Scotland/England 1706–1707
UIUnion with Ireland Act 1800
TOToleration Act 1688/1689

Petition of Right — PR

PR.1 — No taxation, forced loan, benevolence, or similar charge without Parliament

Modern proposition: No tax, forced loan, benevolence, aid, tallage, levy, contribution, public imposition, or similar obligation may be imposed without common consent by Act of Parliament.

Original source extract — PR (Petition of Right)
No Tallage or Ayde should be layd or levyed ... without the good will and assent ... no person should be compelled to make any Loanes ... [or] contribute to any Taxe Tallage Ayde or other like Charge not sett by comon consent in Parliament.

See concordance entry for PR.1

PR.2 — No punishment or molestation for refusing unlawful demands

Modern proposition: A person may not be imprisoned, summoned, bound over, harassed, or otherwise disadvantaged for refusing an unlawful charge, public imposition, or demand.

Original source extract — PR (Petition of Right)
Upon their refusall ... [they] have been ... imprisoned confined and sondry other waies molested and disquieted.

See concordance entry for PR.2

PR.3 — No billeting of soldiers or mariners upon the people

Modern proposition: Members of the armed forces may not be quartered in private homes against the will of the inhabitants except under lawful, proportionate, parliamentary authority.

Original source extract — PR (Petition of Right)
Inhabitants against their wills have been compelled to receive [soldiers and mariners] into their houses.

See concordance entry for PR.3

PR.4 — No martial law in place of the ordinary law while the ordinary courts can act

Modern proposition: Martial law, military commission, or emergency jurisdiction may not replace the ordinary courts for ordinary offences while the ordinary law can administer justice.

Original source extract — PR (Petition of Right)
Comissions ... to proceed ... according to the Justice of Martiall Lawe ... are wholly and directlie contrary to the said Lawes and Statutes.

See concordance entry for PR.4

PR.5 — Life, limb, and punishment only by the law of the land

Modern proposition: No person may be condemned, punished, or put to death except by the law of the land and lawful judgment.

Original source extract — PR (Petition of Right)
No man should be forejudged of life or limbe ... [but] by the Lawes established in this your Realme.

See concordance entry for PR.5

PR.6 — Officers and ministers must serve according to law

Modern proposition: Public officers must act according to the laws and statutes of the realm, not merely according to executive command.

Original source extract — PR (Petition of Right)
All your Officers and Ministers shall serve you according to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realme.

See concordance entry for PR.6

Habeas Corpus Act — HC

HC.1 — Delay and evasion by gaolers condemned

Modern proposition: Detaining authorities may not delay, evade, or frustrate judicial review of detention by procedural shifts or excuses.

Original source extract — HC (Habeas Corpus Act)
Great Delayes ... and other shifts [were used] to avoid ... Obedience to such Writts.

See concordance entry for HC.1

HC.2 — Produce the body and certify the true cause of detention

Modern proposition: Upon habeas corpus, the detaining authority must produce the detained person and certify the true cause of detention within strict time limits.

Original source extract — HC (Habeas Corpus Act)
Bring ... the Body of the Partie ... and ... certifie the true causes of his Detainer or Imprisonment.

See concordance entry for HC.2

HC.3 — Habeas corpus available out of term or vacation

Modern proposition: Judicial protection against unlawful detention must not depend on court term, administrative convenience, or procedural timing.

Original source extract — HC (Habeas Corpus Act)
In the Vacation time and out of Terme it shall ... be lawfull ... to award and grant an Habeas Corpus.

See concordance entry for HC.3

HC.4 — Penalties for refusing the writ or withholding the warrant

Modern proposition: A public officer who refuses habeas corpus, refuses to produce the detained person, or withholds the warrant of commitment is personally answerable.

Original source extract — HC (Habeas Corpus Act)
If any Officer ... shall neglect or refuse to make the Returnes ... or to bring the Body ... [he shall] forfeite to the Prisoner or Partie grieved.

See concordance entry for HC.4

HC.5 — No recommittal after release on the same cause

Modern proposition: A person released on habeas corpus may not be re-detained for the same cause by a colourable variation of warrant, label, accusation, or detaining authority.

Original source extract — HC (Habeas Corpus Act)
Noe person ... sett at large upon any Habeas Corpus shall ... bee againe imprisoned ... for the same Offence ... Any colourable pretence or variation ... notwithstanding.

See concordance entry for HC.5

HC.6 — No removal from custody except by lawful writ or necessity

Modern proposition: A detained person may not be moved between prisons or officers to frustrate legal review, except by habeas corpus, other lawful writ, trial, discharge, or genuine necessity.

Original source extract — HC (Habeas Corpus Act)
The said person shall not be removed ... unlesse it be by Habeas Corpus or some other Legall Writt.

See concordance entry for HC.6

HC.7 — No imprisonment beyond the seas to evade the law

Modern proposition: No person may be sent, detained, transported, or imprisoned outside the jurisdiction to avoid the courts or the law of the land.

Original source extract — HC (Habeas Corpus Act)
No Subject ... shall or may be sent Prisoner ... beyond the Seas ... and every such Imprisonment is ... illegall.

See concordance entry for HC.7

Bill of Rights — BR

BR.1 — Arbitrary power recited as constitutional grievance

Modern proposition: The misuse of executive, judicial, military, and financial power to subvert law and liberty is a constitutional grievance.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
The late King ... by ... evill Councellors Judges and Ministers ... did endeavour to subvert ... the Lawes and Liberties of this Kingdome.

See concordance entry for BR.1

BR.2.1 — No suspension of laws by executive authority

Modern proposition: The executive may not suspend laws or their execution without Parliament.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
The pretended Power of Suspending of Laws ... without Consent of Parlyament is illegall.

See concordance entry for BR.2.1

BR.2.2 — No dispensing with laws by executive authority

Modern proposition: The executive may not dispense with legal duties or exempt itself or others from the law by prerogative.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
The pretended Power of Dispensing with Laws ... by Regall Authoritie ... is illegall.

See concordance entry for BR.2.2

BR.2.3 — No money levied by prerogative without Parliament

Modern proposition: Public money may not be raised for the Crown or executive by prerogative without parliamentary grant.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
Levying Money ... by pretence of Prerogative without Grant of Parlyament ... is Illegall.

See concordance entry for BR.2.3

BR.2.4 — Right to petition

Modern proposition: The people have the right to petition public authority, and punishment or prosecution for lawful petitioning is illegal.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
It is the Right of the Subjects to petition the King and all Commitments and Prosecutions for such Petitioning are Illegall.

See concordance entry for BR.2.4

BR.2.5 — No standing army in peace without Parliament

Modern proposition: A standing army or permanent armed force in time of peace requires parliamentary consent and civil control.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
The raising or keeping a standing Army ... in time of Peace unlesse ... with Consent of Parlyament is against Law.

See concordance entry for BR.2.5

BR.2.6 — Free elections

Modern proposition: Elections to Parliament must be free from unlawful interference, manipulation, intimidation, or executive control.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
Election of Members of Parlyament ought to be free.

See concordance entry for BR.2.6

BR.2.7 — Freedom of speech and proceedings in Parliament

Modern proposition: Parliamentary speech, debate, and proceedings may not be impeached or questioned outside Parliament.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
The Freedome of Speech and Debates or Proceedings in Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned ... out of Parlyament.

See concordance entry for BR.2.7

BR.2.8 — No excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishments

Modern proposition: Bail, fines, and punishments must not be excessive, cruel, unusual, degrading, or unlawful.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
Excessive Baile ought not to be required nor excessive Fines imposed nor cruell and unusuall Punishments inflicted.

See concordance entry for BR.2.8

BR.2.9 — No fines or forfeitures before conviction

Modern proposition: Fines, forfeitures, seizures, or confiscations may not be granted, promised, or imposed before lawful conviction or judgment.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
All Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures ... before Conviction are illegall and void.

See concordance entry for BR.2.9

BR.2.10 — Frequent Parliaments

Modern proposition: Parliament must meet frequently enough to redress grievances, amend and preserve the laws, and scrutinise government.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
For Redresse of all Grievances ... Parlyaments ought to be held frequently.

See concordance entry for BR.2.10

BR.3 — Rights claimed as ancient, true, and indubitable

Modern proposition: These liberties are not new grants from government but ancient rights of the people.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
The Rights and Liberties ... are the true auntient and indubitable Rights and Liberties of the People.

See concordance entry for BR.3

BR.4 — No foreign jurisdiction or external authority within the realm

Modern proposition: No foreign or external authority may exercise jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority within the realm except as lawfully received within the constitutional settlement.

Original source extract — BR (Bill of Rights)
Noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie ... within this Realme.

See concordance entry for BR.4

Act of Settlement — AS

AS.1 — Further provision to secure laws and liberties

Modern proposition: Settlement of the constitution exists to secure the laws and liberties of the people, not merely to regulate office-holders or succession.

Original source extract — AS (Act of Settlement)
It is requisite and necessary that some further Provision be made for securing our Religion Laws and Liberties.

See concordance entry for AS.1

AS.2 — No war for non-UK territories or interests without Parliament

Modern proposition: The nation shall not be committed to war for territories, dominions, obligations, or interests not belonging to the United Kingdom without parliamentary consent.

Original source extract — AS (Act of Settlement)
This Nation be not obliged to ingage in any Warr for the Defence of any Dominions or Territories which do not belong to the Crown ... without the Consent of Parliament.

See concordance entry for AS.2

AS.3 — No pardon to defeat impeachment

Modern proposition: Executive pardon, indemnity, or internal immunity may not defeat parliamentary accountability for abuse of public power.

Original source extract — AS (Act of Settlement)
No Pardon under the Great Seal of England be pleadable to an Impeachment by the Commons in Parliament.

See concordance entry for AS.3

AS.4 — The laws are the birthright of the people

Modern proposition: The laws and liberties of the realm are the birthright of the people, and government must be administered according to them.

Original source extract — AS (Act of Settlement)
The Laws of England are the Birthright of the People thereof.

See concordance entry for AS.4

AS.5 — Crown, ministers, and officers must administer according to law

Modern proposition: All rulers, ministers, officers, servants, agencies, and public bodies must exercise power according to law.

Original source extract — AS (Act of Settlement)
Kings and Queens ... ought to administer the Government ... according to the said Laws and all their Officers and Ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same.

See concordance entry for AS.5

Magna Carta 1297 — MC

MC.1 — Liberties of the Church and the realm

Modern proposition: The constitutional settlement acknowledges the Christian inheritance of the realm and the independence of lawful religious and civil institutions within the law.

Original source extract — MC (Magna Carta 1297)
We ... have granted to God, and by this our present Charter have confirmed ... that the Church of England shall be free, and shall have all her whole Rights and Liberties inviolable.

See concordance entry for MC.1

MC.2 — Lawful judgment and the law of the land

Modern proposition: No person may be deprived of liberty, property, status, or protection except by lawful judgment and the law of the land.

Original source extract — MC (Magna Carta 1297)
No Freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs ... but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land.

See concordance entry for MC.2

MC.3 — Justice not sold, denied, or delayed

Modern proposition: Justice must be real, accessible, and timely; public authority may not sell, deny, or delay the remedy due by law.

Original source extract — MC (Magna Carta 1297)
We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right.

See concordance entry for MC.3

Coronation Oath Act 1688 — CO

CO.1 — Government according to the laws and customs of the realm

Modern proposition: The Crown and all public authority are sworn and entrusted to govern according to the laws and customs of the people, not by mere will.

Original source extract — CO (Coronation Oath Act 1688)
Will you solemnly Promise and Swear to Governe the People ... according to the Statutes in Parlyament Agreed on and the Laws and Customs of the same?

See concordance entry for CO.1

CO.2 — Law and justice in mercy

Modern proposition: Government is a solemn trust to cause law and justice to be executed in mercy.

Original source extract — CO (Coronation Oath Act 1688)
Will you ... cause Law and Justice in Mercy to be Executed in all your Judgements?

See concordance entry for CO.2

CO.3 — Christian profession without sectarian disability

Modern proposition: The Christian inheritance of the realm may be recognised as a constitutional foundation while obsolete sectarian exclusions are not revived.

Original source extract — CO (Coronation Oath Act 1688)
Will you ... maintain the Laws of God the true Profession of the Gospell and the Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law?

See concordance entry for CO.3

Claim of Right Act 1689 (Scotland) — CR

CR.1 — Arbitrary power subverts law and liberty

Modern proposition: The conversion of lawful government into arbitrary power is a constitutional offence against law, liberty, and public trust.

Original source extract — CR (Claim of Right Act 1689 (Scotland))
By the advice of evil and wicked counsellors ... did invade the fundamentall constitution of this kingdom and altered it from a legall limited monarchy to ane arbitrary despotick power.

See concordance entry for CR.1

CR.2 — No dispensing or suspending power contrary to law

Modern proposition: Executive dispensing or suspending of law, or treating public office as above law, is inconsistent with constitutional government.

Original source extract — CR (Claim of Right Act 1689 (Scotland))
The assuming and exercising a power to dispense with and suspend laws, and the execution of laws, without consent of Parliament, is illegal.

See concordance entry for CR.2

CR.3 — Courts, oaths, and public offices must not be instruments of arbitrary power

Modern proposition: Courts, oaths, commissions, and offices may not be manipulated to evade ordinary law or impose arbitrary power.

Original source extract — CR (Claim of Right Act 1689 (Scotland))
The erecting of courts ... without authority of Parliament ... and the imposing of oaths without authority of Parliament are contrary to law.

See concordance entry for CR.3

Acts of Union with Scotland/England 1706–1707 — US

US.1 — One Kingdom and one Parliament

Modern proposition: The Union creates one political realm and one Parliament while preserving constitutional restraints and inherited liberties.

Original source extract — US (Acts of Union with Scotland/England 1706–1707)
The Two Kingdoms ... shall upon the First day of May ... be United into One Kingdom by the Name of Great Britain ... [and] represented by one and the same Parliament.

See concordance entry for US.1

US.2 — Free intercourse, trade, and navigation within the Union

Modern proposition: Union entails free passage, commerce, trade, navigation, and lawful intercourse among the people of the realm.

Original source extract — US (Acts of Union with Scotland/England 1706–1707)
There be a Communication of all other Rights Privileges and Advantages which do or may belong to the Subjects of either Kingdom ... and a full Freedom and Intercourse of Trade and Navigation.

See concordance entry for US.2

US.3 — Public law may be made common, but private right requires evident utility

Modern proposition: Laws concerning public right and policy may be harmonised throughout the Kingdom, but private rights, property, inheritance, courts, and local institutions should not be altered except for evident utility to those affected.

Original source extract — US (Acts of Union with Scotland/England 1706–1707)
The Laws concerning Regulation of Trade Customs and such Excises ... be the same ... but ... private Right ... may be altered ... only for the evident Utility of the Subjects within Scotland.

See concordance entry for US.3

US.4 — Preservation of courts and administration of justice

Modern proposition: Local courts and institutions of justice may be preserved within the Union, subject only to lawful regulation for the better administration of justice.

Original source extract — US (Acts of Union with Scotland/England 1706–1707)
The Court of Session or Colledge of Justice do after the Union ... remain in all time coming ... subject nevertheless to such Regulations for the better Administration of Justice.

See concordance entry for US.4

US.5 — Preservation of rights, privileges, and subjecthood

Modern proposition: The people of each part of the Kingdom are not internal foreigners, but enjoy the rights, privileges, and advantages of common subjecthood.

Original source extract — US (Acts of Union with Scotland/England 1706–1707)
The Subjects of the United Kingdom of Great Britain shall ... have full Freedom and Intercourse ... and a Communication of all other Rights Privileges and Advantages.

See concordance entry for US.5

Union with Ireland Act 1800 — UI

UI.1 — One United Kingdom and one Parliament

Modern proposition: The United Kingdom is a single constitutional realm represented in one Parliament, subject to the constitutional restraints of law and liberty.

Original source extract — UI (Union with Ireland Act 1800)
Great Britain and Ireland shall ... be united into one Kingdom ... [and] represented in one and the same Parliament.

See concordance entry for UI.1

UI.2 — Equal footing in trade, navigation, and privileges

Modern proposition: Union entails reciprocal privileges and equal footing in lawful trade, navigation, and intercourse between the peoples of the realm.

Original source extract — UI (Union with Ireland Act 1800)
The Subjects of Great Britain and Ireland shall ... be entitled to the same Privileges ... in respect of Trade and Navigation.

See concordance entry for UI.2

Toleration Act 1688/1689 — TO

TO.1 — Peaceable exercise of lawful religion

Modern proposition: The Christian inheritance of the realm supports civil peace, liberty of conscience, and the quiet exercise of lawful faith by peaceable persons.

Original source extract — TO (Toleration Act 1688/1689)
Some Ease to Scrupulous Consciences in the Exercise of Religion ... [for persons] not for any Matter of their Religious Worship ... provided that such Meeting be not with the Doors locked barred or bolted.

See concordance entry for TO.1